Tool Comparison

LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads for Demand Gen

LinkedIn wins for account-based and awareness campaigns targeting specific titles. Google Ads wins for capturing existing demand through search intent.

9.5/10
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
7.0/10
Google Ads
3.3%
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions in Jobs
0.0%
Google Ads in Jobs

Quick Comparison

FeatureLinkedIn Marketing SolutionsGoogle Ads
B2B TargetingBest in class (title, company)Keyword-based intent
Cost Per Click$8-15+ average$2-8 average
Lead QualityHigh (professional context)Varies by keyword
ABM SupportMatched AudiencesCustomer Match
Campaign TypesSponsored content, InMail, videoSearch, display, video, Performance Max
AttributionBasicStrong (Google Analytics)
Best ForAwareness and ABM campaignsCapturing existing search intent
Typical Budget$5K-50K+/mo$2K-100K+/mo

LinkedIn Marketing Solutions Overview

LinkedIn Marketing Solutions appears in 6.2% of demand gen job postings. For B2B demand gen, LinkedIn is the primary paid advertising channel. No other platform offers the same level of professional targeting by title, company, industry, and seniority.

Demand gen teams use LinkedIn for everything from awareness campaigns to ABM-targeted ads to lead gen forms. The platform's Matched Audiences feature lets you upload account lists and target specific companies, making it the go-to channel for account-based advertising.

Google Ads Overview

Google Ads is a popular other tool used by demand gen teams.

Pricing Comparison

LinkedIn Marketing Solutions: Self-serve with minimum $10/day spend. Average CPCs of $8-15 for demand gen targeting.

Google Ads: Contact for pricing.

Job Market Data

LinkedIn Marketing Solutions appears in 3.3% of demand gen job postings (21 mentions). Google Ads appears in 0.0% (0 mentions). This means LinkedIn Marketing Solutions is the more commonly required skill.

Decision Framework

Two questions decide most LinkedIn Marketing Solutions vs Google Ads bake-offs: which platform fits the way your team operates today, and which one fits the way the team will operate in two years.

Our Verdict

LinkedIn wins for account-based and awareness campaigns targeting specific titles. Google Ads wins for capturing existing demand through search intent.

Data from Demand Gen Insider's proprietary database of 639 demand generation job postings with 66.5% salary disclosure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: LinkedIn Marketing Solutions or Google Ads?

LinkedIn wins for account-based and awareness campaigns targeting specific titles. Google Ads wins for capturing existing demand through search intent.

Is LinkedIn Marketing Solutions more popular than Google Ads?

LinkedIn Marketing Solutions appears in 3.3% of demand gen job postings vs 0.0% for Google Ads. Yes, LinkedIn Marketing Solutions is more commonly required.

Can I use both LinkedIn Marketing Solutions and Google Ads?

Some teams do use both, but there's significant overlap. Most demand gen teams choose one as their primary advertising & outreach solution and supplement with specialized tools where needed.

How do I migrate from LinkedIn Marketing Solutions to Google Ads (or vice versa)?

Migration between LinkedIn Marketing Solutions and Google Ads typically takes 2-8 weeks depending on data volume and workflow complexity. Start by auditing your current workflows, lead scoring rules, and integrations. Export your data and map fields to the new platform. Run both systems in parallel for at least two weeks before cutting over. Budget for temporary productivity loss during the transition period.

What should I consider before choosing between LinkedIn Marketing Solutions and Google Ads?

Start with the gap. Write down the one or two advertising & outreach jobs your current setup is failing at, then ask both vendors to walk through how they would solve those jobs. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions and Google Ads both look great in scripted demos, so force the test to your workflow. Then pressure-test pricing on a 3-year horizon, not a 1-year contract.